O
Provo City

Provo City · week of September 19, 2026

Planning Commission recommends denial of Zone Map Amendment Recommendation (PLRZ20260393), 4–0

Summarized from the official meeting transcript — every claim links to the moment it was said. How we make this

What changed in Provo City

  • Zone Map Amendment Recommendation (PLRZ20260393)

    0 yes, 4 no

    Melissa Kendall (no), Jonathon Hill (no), Tosh Metzger (no), Matthew Wheelwright (no)

    Watch this moment →
  • Concept Plan Approval (PLCP20260407)

    7 yes, 0 no

    Watch this moment →

Development activity

  • Park Plaza Apartment Redevelopment

    910 North 900 East

    A request to rezone the property from Residential Conservation to Campus Residential to allow for 157 apartment units.

    still pending

    Track this project →
  • Park Plaza Redevelopment (Cole West)

    910 N 900 E, Provo, UT

    A zone map amendment from Residential Conservation (RC) to Campus Residential (CR) to allow a 157-unit student housing apartment building.

    denied (3-4) · still denied

    Track this project →
  • Park Plaza Redevelopment Concept Plan

    910 N 900 E, Provo, UT

    Concept plan approval for a 157-unit apartment building with structured parking, bike facilities, and indoor/outdoor amenity spaces.

    approved (7-0) · still approved

    Track this project →

Also discussed

  • Foothills Neighborhood Development

    A developer wants to build a large 157-unit apartment complex in the Foothills area. This could significantly change the density and character of the neighborhood.

    What it means: The developer and potential future residents seeking housing in the area.

    Follow this issue →
  • Wymount Terrace Parking and Redevelopment

    The proposed 157-unit student apartment building requests a reduced parking ratio of 0.5 stalls per bed, sparking intense debate among commissioners and residents about whether this will worsen street parking congestion in surrounding neighborhoods.

    What it means: The developer and students seeking lower overall housing costs by avoiding mandatory parking fees will benefit from the reduced parking requirement.

    Follow this issue →

Published by OpenUtah. 1 meeting covered.