O
Provo City
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

ADU Permitting

Provo City

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (1)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Sep 23, 2025.

Public comments (6)

SupportiveRhoda GoffinSep 23, 2025

Expressed strong support for the Bannock Drive ADU applicants, noting neighborhood survey results favored the request because the homeowners are trying to do things the right way.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Sep 23, 2025 · 29:08 →
SupportiveJennifer KnappSep 23, 2025

Shared her personal experience as the creator of Provo's first overlay zone 30 years ago, stating that living upstairs while renting the basement helped her young family start out.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Sep 23, 2025 · 32:28 →
OpposedSharon MehmetSep 23, 2025

Expressed concern about spot zoning for individual homes and questioned why exceptions are made house by house rather than maintaining consistent zoning codes.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Sep 23, 2025 · 34:19 →
ConcernedBen IyerSep 23, 2025

Cautioned the council against excessive spot zoning, emphasizing that residents choose single-family neighborhoods for stability and cumulative exceptions risk altering neighborhood character.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Sep 23, 2025 · 36:16 →
ConcernedDavid TaylorSep 23, 2025

Discussed the history of Oak Hills and urged the council to carefully weigh the long-term impacts of spot exemptions on established neighborhoods.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Sep 23, 2025 · 37:53 →
SupportiveWilliam GibsonSep 23, 2025

Spoke via phone as a property co-owner, questioning why the ADU code states 50% ownership for an owner-occupant if staff interprets it as requiring 100%.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Sep 23, 2025 · 52:31 →