O
Provo City
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

An ordinance amending Provo City Code regarding development standards for the year 2026. (PLOTA20250658)

Provo City

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (15)Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
16
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jan 27, 2026.

Public comments (16)

SupportiveAlexander MonsonJan 27, 2026

Spoke in favor of keeping 24-foot streets, citing the Shakespeare neighborhood as a safe, family-friendly, walkable area.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 43:00 →
SupportiveJacob WixomJan 27, 2026

Argued that narrower human-scale streets foster community and connection, whereas wide streets prioritize cars over people.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 44:56 →
SupportiveEthan UnklesbayJan 27, 2026

Expressed confidence that residents can follow parking rules and urged the council not to eliminate 24-foot street options.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 46:50 →
SupportiveBarbie DeSotoJan 27, 2026

Supported retaining 24-foot streets, noting that walkable neighborhoods have higher home values and keep children safe.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 49:03 →
SupportiveSusan Kruger-BarberJan 27, 2026

Shared experiences with street diets in Joaquin and cited national best practices favoring narrower residential streets.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 51:13 →
SupportiveEmily WeatherheadJan 27, 2026

A Shakespeare neighborhood resident who testified that her narrow street feels safe, handles emergency vehicles fine, and fosters community.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 53:09 →
SupportiveLaura LevittJan 27, 2026

Used her background in user experience design to argue that narrow streets intuitively slow drivers and improve neighborhood safety.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 56:18 →
SupportiveTyler FleischmanJan 27, 2026

Shared how Falls Church, Virginia reduced traffic by investing in walking, biking, and narrow streets, proving traffic is a design choice.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 59:18 →
SupportiveAaron WheatleyJan 27, 2026

Noted that wide streets tempt drivers to speed unconsciously and urged focusing on enforcing existing rules rather than adding new ones.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 1:01:28 →
SupportiveGrace TuellerJan 27, 2026

Shared that she walked every public street in Provo (about 300 miles) and found narrower streets to be the most pleasant and walkable.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 1:02:50 →
OpposedAaron SkabelundJan 27, 2026

Representing Bike Walk Provo and Families for Safe Streets, opposed eliminating 24-foot streets, calling narrow streets vital life-saving traffic-calming devices.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 1:03:40 →
SupportiveBrooklyn LorenceJan 27, 2026

Shared safety challenges biking with her child on wide roads experiencing cut-through traffic and supported narrower street planning.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 1:05:50 →
SupportiveJonathan HandyJan 27, 2026

Argued that human-scale design should take precedence over vehicle space, suggesting smaller emergency vehicles could be used if needed.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 1:08:03 →
SupportivePhineas JensenJan 27, 2026

Stated the ordinance restricts future design options and urged the council to keep 24-foot streets as a proven option.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 1:09:24 →
SupportiveClark DavisJan 27, 2026

Spoke remotely as a designer seeking to build infill housing, explaining that 30-foot street requirements would make his backyard infill projects unfeasible.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 1:11:36 →
SupportiveDallin FlakeJan 27, 2026

Supported narrower streets as a natural speed deterrent that reduces policing needs and enhances neighborhood enjoyment.

City Council Meetings (Regular) - Jan 27, 2026 · 5:07 →