development

This resident expressed concern about the density and potential for investor purchases leading to student rentals for the 2000 North Canyon Road development.

This resident raised concerns about fire risk in the windy canyon area and the 2023 general planning process that favored open space preservation.

This resident requested that construction vehicles for the Foothill Orchards project use the north entrance instead of the south entrance near existing homes.

A resident wrote in to oppose the project, citing concerns about electricity rates, air quality, and noise.

She inquired about a new sign on a long-vacant property, and was informed that demolition negotiations are underway and the property is condemned.

A resident spoke about street width standards and parking, expressing concern that removing the 24-foot option assumes residents won't follow parking rules and urging the council to trust residents and maintain flexibility.

A resident supported narrower, human-scale streets, stating that they encourage slower traffic and neighborhood interaction, and expressed concern that wider standards prioritize vehicles over community connection.

A resident of the Shakespeare neighborhood spoke in support of narrower streets, describing her neighborhood as safe and walkable, and expressed concern that widening streets could negatively impact livability.

A resident spoke in support of narrower street design, stating it improves driving behavior, safety, and quality of life, and cited examples of cities that reduced traffic by investing in pedestrian and bike-friendly designs.

A resident spoke in support of narrower, human-scale streets, explaining how they naturally slow vehicle speeds and expressing concern about high speeds on wider streets making it unsafe for children.

A resident spoke in support of narrower residential streets and street-calming measures, citing research and examples from other cities that show improved safety and community vitality with narrower streets.

A resident supported retaining 24-foot street standards, noting that desirable neighborhoods have narrower streets and that wider streets can encourage higher speeds, making neighborhoods feel unsafe.

A resident expressed support for 24-foot streets, citing the Shakespeare neighborhood as an example of a safe and walkable area, and urged the council to carefully consider the trade-offs before changing standards.

A neighbor who lives behind the property expressed support, stating the project is a good fit for the area.

A neighbor expressed support for the project but emphasized that future construction on the adjacent lot must strictly follow the East Center Street Design Corridor rules.

He asked questions to ensure the project would not turn into a low-cost motel or transient housing.

Representing the Maeser Neighborhood, she noted that while there were initial concerns about transient housing, the applicant's plan addressed them and the neighborhood supports the project.

Asked the commission to deny the project because of his feelings about the current state of Provo.

Expressed neighborhood concerns about potential development and density.

Expressed concern about rapid development and flooding risks.

Advocated for preserving open space near the Provo River Delta.

He asked what the city is doing to attract grocery stores and retail to the west side.

A resident asked about the status of the Provo Mall redesign and expressed concerns about the potential displacement of a trailer park.

She expressed concern about new multi-story buildings on State Street, citing water pressure issues and environmental impacts on deer.

Proposed a two-way protected bike/mobility lane on 900 North to improve safety.

A resident asked if public access to the Bonneville Shoreline Trail would be maintained during the development.

A resident expressed confusion and concern about the PID and the impact of the Buckley Draw development on local infrastructure.

Laurine expressed concern about warehouse development near the Provo River.

A resident expressed strong opposition to data centers in West Provo due to limited water and energy resources.

The District 3 Neighborhood Chair noted that residents generally support preserving agricultural heritage but have concerns about noise and parking.

A resident expressed concern about the safety of students at Treeside Charter School due to the proposed industrial development.