O
Provo City
← All officials
TH

District 4 Council Member· 2024–2028

Travis Hoban

Provo City

About

Travis Hoban's platform appears to focus on government reform, specifically advocating for congressional term limits. Other articles discuss his inauguration as a Provo City Council member and the broader political landscape in Utah County, but do not detail further specific platform positions.

Campaign promises (1)

  • government-reform
    Travis Hoban pledges to support congressional term limits.
    Related votes

At a glance

News mentions
0

Term ending Dec 31, 2028.

Voice

Meetings spoken in
39
Total speaking time
2:22:50
Avg per meeting
3:40
Segments
2335

Want every word Hoban has said?

The OpenCity MCP for Claude.ai answers questions like “what has Hoban said about housing this year” with one prompt — full speaking history, with YouTube timestamps.

Voice summary

District 4 Council Member Travis Hoban on the recordAI-generated · 8 meetings

Council Member Travis Hoban has consistently emphasized fiscal responsibility, data-driven governance, and independent oversight in his municipal decision-making. He has frequently engaged in technical inquiries regarding infrastructure and city operations, specifically advocating for parking enforcement efficacy and fire safety over the adoption of narrow street designs. His record is marked by a preference for standardized procedures, such as his proposal to rotate audit committee appointments and his call for objective, data-backed approaches to housing and economic development studies. Notably, Hoban successfully moved to remove the 24-foot street option from city proposals, reflecting his cautious approach toward long-term development planning and potential infrastructure liabilities.

Filtered to General

Top issues during term (20)(General)

critical→Jan 2025[43]

Dark Sky Lighting Standards

Null

critical↓Jan 2025[36]

Zoning Code Rewrite (Title 14)

Funded through previously allocated municipal and federal funds.

high↓Jan 2026[35]

Canyon Road Residential Rezone

Property valuation and development costs for the 2000 N. Canyon Road parcel.

critical↓Jan 2026[23]

zoning decision

The project utilizes existing commercial space, requiring no new infrastructure investment from the city.

critical↑Mar 2025[20]

Private Water System Integration

Informs future municipal utility capital improvement planning and rate structures.

critical↓Mar 2025[20]

Covey Center Infrastructure

The city may be asked to provide financial assistance for infrastructure upgrades.

critical↓Jan 2026[16]

Personnel Evaluation and Closed Session

None directly, but aims to improve efficiency of staff and council time.

high↓Jan 2026[7]

rezoning approval

No direct financial impact on the city was discussed, but the project involves private investment in property improvements.

critical↓Mar 2025[6]

Buckley Draw Debris Flow Mitigation

The project involves significant private investment in land development and infrastructure.

medium↓May 2026[6]

mudslide response

Potential costs associated with implementing new mapping and updated development standards.

critical↓Apr 2025[5]

Downtown Public Space

The project is a private investment that adds value to an existing downtown building.

critical↓Aug 2026[5]

landslide response

Development on these lots requires significant investment in engineering and retaining structures.

high↓Feb 2026[4]

data center power use

The proposal removes the requirement for developers to pay for third-party environmental reviews for projects over 5 MW.

high↓Aug 2026[4]

light pollution policy

You might have to spend a little cash to swap out old bulbs or fixtures to meet the new standards.

high↓Jan 2026[3]

zoning change denial

Potential increase in property tax revenue from residential units.

high↓Jan 2026[2]

AI license plate readers

No direct financial impact mentioned, but relates to privacy and civil liberties.

high↓Feb 2026[1]

air quality

Potential minor costs for truck drivers if they need alternative idling solutions, but aims to improve quality of life for residents.

critical↓Jan 2026[1]

State of the City Address

Will influence budget allocations for the upcoming fiscal year.

critical↓Mar 2026[1]

land sale block

Selling the land would provide funds for park improvements, but the city would lose a valuable public asset. The proposed sale price was $1,370,000.

medium↓Mar 2026[1]

infrastructure failure

The program has $100,000 in unspent funds, with typical annual requests ranging from $30,000 to $50,000.

Moved or seconded (10)

Motions Hoban personally put forward or seconded. Attribution comes from the minutes; where the minutes name somebody we cannot match to the roster we leave it out rather than guess, so this is a floor, not a total.

  • secondedpassed 6-02026-04-28

    Councilor Whipple moved into closed session pursuant to state law for discussion of character and competency of an individual and the potential sale or transfer of property.

  • secondedpassed 6-02026-03-10

    bring the ordinance to the March 24, 2026 Council meeting

  • secondedpassed2026-01-27

    Cancel Special Work Meeting

    Title matched to the agenda, not quoted from the motion

  • movedpassed 7-02026-01-13

    Councilor Hoban nominated Councilor Katrice MacKay as chair.

  • secondedpassed 5-22025-11-11

    directing staff to change the survey area map to exclude south of Lakeview Parkway (except for properties already zoned as commercial)

  • movedpassed2025-11-11

    Split Carterville Neighborhood

    Title matched to the agenda, not quoted from the motion

  • movedpassed 7-02025-04-22

    Councilor Hoban moved to reconsider the previous vote. Councilor Bogdin seconded the motion.

  • secondedpassed 4-32025-04-22

    Chair Garrett motioned to continue this item to a future Council meeting.

  • movedpassed 7-02025-03-11

    Councilor Hoban made a motion to request planning staff to come back with definition of density limits for group quarters as soon as possible with a text amendment to be brought fo…

  • moved2025-02-11

    Councilor Hoban made a substitute motion to remove the high user tier and continue discussions.

Decisions during term (10)

Recorded while Hoban was in office — not necessarily decisions they moved, spoke to, or voted on.